The biggest shortcoming of Chinese people living in the modern world

 


As a Chinese, in context of racial and ethnic competition, I believe shortcomings of my nation are we are relatively timid and therefore cannot fight, we are tactically smart but lack strategic vision, and we have strong desires on material level but lack transcendental pursuits.

I have not yet mentioned the biggest shortcoming of the Chinese compared to whites: lack of organizational skills. There is a saying in the Chinese community that a Chinese is like a dragon, and a group of Chinese are like a swarm of worms. For thousands of years, the centralized and unified autocratic government has tried every means to weaken and persecute the spontaneous grassroots organizations of the Chinese people, as well as local autonomy or independent forces, so that they can implement comprehensive and stable rule from the emperor to the peasants. The result of the long-term implementation of this rule and the corresponding ideological influence is that the Chinese people seriously lack the ability to organize themselves. In their own land, they are obedient to the government. In Western countries such as the United States, they are still obedient to the government in their home country because they do not have the ability to organize themselves and are usually unable to integrate into the local community because they are not used to being independent people. Chinese people immigrate to Western countries, but still maintain close relations with their home countries, and are even suspected of being spies working for the home country's government. This characteristic of them has a lot to do with it. In fact, I am like this too. The rules I have set for myself as an overseas self-media operator are: 1. Do not contact foreigners or organizations; 2. Do not organize your own organizations; 3. Do not clearly oppose the four basic principles.

In this regard, Chinese people are not even as good as black people. On the one hand, black people, especially black Americans, have lived with white people for hundreds of years and have learned some of the white people's skills. On the other hand, black people have not been persecuted by the unified centralized authoritarian rule for two thousand years, and many of them still retain the self-confidence, courage and brute force of primitive people.

In China, some local governments now even recruit black people as civil servants. Although this makes most Chinese people, whose sons and daughters who are college students cannot find jobs, very dissatisfied, I think that in the long run, introducing black people and mixing them with Chinese people can enhance the vitality of the Chinese people.

There are many Chinese in the US and Europe now. Why haven't I mentioned their influence? Is it just because I'm also a PRC Chinese? The reason is that the Chinese simply don't conquer other countries through infiltration like Muslims or blacks do. Why is that? Consider the situation in Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand. The Chinese began invading the region they call Southeast Asia on a large scale about a thousand years ago, yet even our fellow Chinese there are still second-class citizens in Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, and even Myanmar. Recently, Indonesians may be experiencing another wave of anti-Chinese sentiment. In reality, the cultures of all these ethnic groups are inferior to those of the Chinese. Unless China sends regular troops, the Chinese cannot conquer other ethnic groups or countries through cultural infiltration. In this respect, we are inferior to Muslims, or even to blacks. Why? After two thousand years of unified, centralized rule, the Chinese have become completely desertified. Because traditional human organizational systems—bloodline, regional, guild, family—have been eliminated, banned, or weakened, they have become highly atomized, lacking the relationships, means, technology, and experience for self-organization. Their only organization is government. This is also the reason why Chinese people rarely cause trouble in their own country, while many Chinese people in European and American countries still work secretly for their governments.

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

The five stages and strategies of South Africanization of the United States

图片
In today's globalized world, the United States, as the beacon of Western democracy, faces unprecedented internal challenges. From racial tensions and economic inequality to surging waves of immigration, these issues are not isolated but interwoven into a complex web that subtly reveals an unsettling similarity—to South Africa's post-apartheid era. After ending apartheid in 1994, South Africa should have ushered in prosperity, yet it has been mired in long-term stagnation due to failed land reforms, economic decline, and persistent racial antagonism: forced expropriation of white farmers' land led to a sharp drop in agricultural output, gun control policies exacerbated skyrocketing crime rates, and government corruption along with media control further eroded social trust. Today, certain social dynamics in the United States seem to be replaying this trajectory: the infiltration of extreme left-wing ideologies, the proliferation of identity politics, and the cultural shoc...
阅读全文

The Third Way of Governing a Diverse Nation：Black people have the right to establish their own autonomous state

图片
    The fate of Britain after World War II—victorious yet defeated—stemmed not only from the successful implementation of the Soviet-American strategy to suppress Britain but, more critically, from Britain’s inability to devise a system capable of establishing an acceptable order for the vast territories and diverse peoples conquered during its imperialist era. In essence, the challenges confronting the United States and European nations today mirror those faced by Britain post-World War II: how to create an order that citizens of different cultures and ethnicities are willing to accept. In my judgment, the Trump administration is clearly incapable of achieving this task. Indeed, the nature of the problems it faces parallels those encountered by the British government after World War II, as well as by Caesar and Augustus in ancient Rome. Under pressure from the United States and the Soviet Union, post-war Britain opted for contraction, shrinking into a small, single-ethnicity ...
阅读全文

The overthrow of the white South African regime should be seen as aggression：Correspondence between the increase in illegal immigration in South Africa and the collapse of white rule in South Africa

图片
South Africa does indeed face an immigration issue, and the increase in foreign immigrants may have been closely tied to the overthrow of white rule (apartheid), particularly as their presence and involvement played a role in this historical shift. Below, I’ll analyze the correspondence between the rise in foreign immigration and the collapse of white rule in South Africa, as per your request, drawing on historical data and context. 1. Historical Context of Immigration in South Africa South Africa has been a hub for labor migration in southern Africa since the 19th century, especially during the mining boom (gold and diamonds), when large numbers of black workers from neighboring countries like Mozambique, Lesotho, and Eswatini were recruited. During the apartheid era (1948-1994), these immigrants were tightly controlled, treated as temporary labor without permanent residency rights, and deported after their contracts ended. Meanwhile, white immigrants, primarily from Europe, were priv...
阅读全文