European and American countries are facing the most serious civilization crisis since the fall of the Roman Empire

 

There is nothing new under the sun.

Today, the crisis facing European and American societies is essentially similar to major historical events such as the decline of the ancient Sumerian city-state, the collapse of the Roman Empire, and the fall of the Han and Jin Empires in China. These events all reflect the interaction between civilized nations and barbarians: in the process of conquering barbarians, civilized nations are conquered by them as they gradually become civilized. This process is essentially a fusion of culture and race, but it is often accompanied by the decline of civilization. The specific reasons are discussed in a special article, which I call the "short board effect of civilization fusion". In this regard, historian Oswald Spengler also pointed out in his "The Decline of the West" that the rise and fall of civilizations is often an inevitable cycle, and cultural fusion is a key factor.

In the process of civilization fusion, civilized nations often find it difficult to stick to their own culture and system, and are gradually assimilated or replaced. History has proved that this "short board effect of civilization fusion" is universal: when nations of different cultures merge, it is often the barbarians who, after accepting some of the achievements of civilization, use their original vitality and combat effectiveness to erode or even replace the core of civilized nations. The challenges facing European and American societies today are exactly the same as the fate of the Roman Empire. If this phenomenon can be regarded as a historical law, then the "South Africanization" trend of European and American societies may be difficult to avoid in the future. Regarding this phenomenon, civilization scholar Arnold J. Toynbee once emphasized in his "Historical Research" that the decline of civilization is not caused by external forces, but the loss of internal cultural confidence and vitality. When the barbarians gradually gain power in the process of civilization, their rise is often accompanied by the decline of civilized nations.

When people of color seize the dominance of European and American countries, they will not establish tribal kingdoms, nor will they destroy all cities to herd sheep. The civilization they establish is only because their interests, preferences and abilities are inferior to the current civilization, but they will eventually continue to be civilized. However, in this process, civilized nations will suffer great losses, and many of their achievements will be destroyed. From a long-term historical perspective, this phenomenon actually marks the civilization of more nations and peoples, although in this process, the original civilization may suffer significant losses and its achievements will be partially destroyed. In his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Gibbon described the decline of the empire from the perspective of the Romans. Ironically, his ancestors were the Germanic barbarians who conquered Rome.

The poorer and more backward people are, the more likely they are to have children. In addition to their victory by numbers, the inadequate development of people caused by poverty and ignorance makes them lack other sources of happiness besides sex.Europeans and Americans use democracy, republic and science and technology as weapons, while Muslims and blacks use genitals as weapons. We Chinese are very familiar with this kind of thing. Our ancestors were conquered by foreign races many times, but they relied on their huge numbers to win back the game.Who can stop the South Africanization of the United States? I don't think Trump can do it either. In ancient times, the population explosion of backward nations would be curbed by foreign conquest wars, plagues, and internal fratricide, but with the establishment of modern civilization, these traditional means of spontaneously controlling population "cancer" have become ineffective. When some of the world's elites, like Bill Gates, try to plan for population reduction, these plans may seem cruel, but they are also for the long-term development of mankind.

Muslims and people of color themselves have no real power. The real threat is those within European and American society who want to use Muslims and people of color to gain power. Without their support, Muslims and people of color cannot subvert any European and American country, even in the UK now. This is both a comforting point and the biggest risk.

The battle between Trump and Harris is ostensibly a battle between the left and right parties in the United States, but in reality it is a battle between liberal capitalism and dictatorship Marxism. As early as the first half of the last century, Gramsci, Lukacs, Marcuse and other pioneers of cultural Marxism had proposed the systematic theory of using LGBT, blacks and other minorities, Muslims and other marginal groups to launch revolutions within capitalist society and overthrow capitalist society. The rampant Nazism in Europe led many cultural Marxist scholars to come to the United States, forming the basis for the rampant white left culture in today's American academic circles and university campuses, and ultimately led to the transformation of the Democratic Party of the United States from a bourgeois democratic parliamentary party to a party controlled by extreme left-wing ideas. The end of apartheid in South Africa is essentially the seizure of power by black Marxists in the capitalist republic of South Africa and the implementation of the socialist system. It is another major victory of cultural Marxist practice after the independence wave of former colonial countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America after World War II. A similar plot of this scene is likely to be realized in the United States with the long-term rule of the Democratic Party.

Defeating democracy with democracy - this is the magic weapon of barbarians against civilized people. Aren't you civilized? We are going to use civilization as a weapon to defeat you. The de-whitening of South Africa or the end of the apartheid era is a classic battle in this regard. With the support of the Soviet Union, with the support of the Soviet Union, with the support of the Soviet Union, thousands of illegal immigrants entered South Africa, forcing the South African Boers to give up the land and regime they had worked hard to get from the British. To be honest, white people have a lot of racial pride and even arrogance when facing non-whites. Barbarians are indeed vulnerable, even today, but this time in the battles in the United States and Europe, including in the past in South Africa, you must know that the enemies of the democratic system come not only from outside, but also from within you. Some of these enemies of democracy are your own corrupt compatriots, and some are Trojan horses that have already entered your interior.

The Palestinian representative said: We are also human beings, and we should be treated equally. This is not true. Only people of the same level of civilization should treat each other equally. I am a Chinese, can I eat in Apple's employee cafeteria? If there is a time wormhole, and Neanderthals rush into modern human society from there, they will kill all foreigners they see and eat meat. Can we treat Neanderthals equally? Civilized people may really not be able to beat barbarians. This is true. I guess New Zealand is likely to be the second South Africanized country in European and American society, because it is too isolated like South Africa. If Americans, British, French, Italians, etc. don't find a way, your country will sooner or later become South Africanized. Civilized people really can't beat barbarians. This is true. A boxing champion was beaten black and blue by a gangster in a slum in California. His friend asked him, Tyson couldn't beat you like this. What's going on? Oh, I've been waiting for the referee to blow the whistle, the boxing champion said, and if I don't wear gloves, I don't know how to punch.

The biggest threat comes from the white left in the United States (white women among them like men of color, but they generally look down on Asian men. It is regrettable and intriguing) and the black people who are unwilling to remain silent. These are internal enemies. They have plunged the United States into chaos, and you will not be able to effectively fight back against them. The threat of Muslims is second. They are essentially the same race as white people in Europe and the United States, so it is easy for them to penetrate European and American society, just like the Ugandan candidate for New York Mayor. The organizational power of Muslims is annoying everywhere, even in PRC China. However, Muslims must combine with white leftists to truly subvert European and American countries. As a Chinese, I tell you responsibly that the PRC Chinese and their regime are really no match for white people in Europe and the United States. The weakness of the Chinese regime lies in the lack of human ability caused by excessive corruption and institutional rigidity. No PRC Chinese will dream of conquering the United States. For the inferior PRC Chinese, attacking the United States is self-defense anyway. Like the PRC Chinese, the Russians are external enemies to Europe and the United States. Many of the white leftists in Europe and the United States can trace their teachers back to the exiled White Russians from Russia. Many of these exiled White Russians are spies sent by the Soviet Union. But that's all they did. The real threat of the White Left is not that they are directly against democracy, they also agree with it, but that they will attract many barbarians who are against democracy to enter European and American countries.

In the face of such a situation, historical experience tells us that we can adopt three coping strategies:

**Best strategy**: European and American countries should take the initiative to provoke wars and attack those countries that continuously import immigrants to European and American countries. Taking Rome as an example, it is absolutely impossible to stop spreading civilization through expansion, and it is necessary to directly attack the base camp of the barbarian countries. In this way, internal contradictions can be resolved. At the same time, the economic benefits brought by the war can also be used to meet the interests of new immigrants and strike at the foundation of the barbarian countries, thereby expanding the influence and base of civilized countries. This strategy not only conforms to Machiavelli's suggestion in The Prince, that is, to consolidate internal power through foreign wars, but also responds to the prophecy in the Bible that the descendants of Japheth will rule the world, which is the destiny of the white people. However, this strategy also requires European and American countries to re-examine their own cultural beliefs and historical missions. As Martin Luther once warned, the nation that rebels against God will not escape its fate.

**Middle Strategy**: In the context of the inevitable South Africanization, the people of European and American countries can choose to retreat strategically, abandon those regions or countries that cannot maintain the majority of the population, concentrate their efforts on resource-rich and white-majority regions or countries, implement strict immigration and naturalization policies, and prevent large-scale infiltration of foreign immigrants. Regions or countries that implement this strategy are similar to the Republic of Venice after the fall of the Roman Empire. After several generations of competition, in the process of the continuous civilization of the barbarians, the civilized countries will eventually regain the upper hand. This strategy aims to preserve the foundation of civilization for the future, so that civilization can be revitalized at the right time and become the forerunner in the next round of historical cycles.

**Worst Strategy**: The most negative option is to take a laissez-faire attitude towards the South Africanization phenomenon in European and American countries, choose to lie down, and wait for the second coming of Jesus to save everything. Although this strategy may conform to the eschatological view in some religious beliefs, from historical experience, it means the complete abandonment of civilization and the passive acceptance of the dominance of the barbarians.

In summary, in the face of the repetition of history and the challenge of civilization, mankind must carefully choose a response strategy, learn lessons from history, and leave room for future development. History does not simply repeat itself, but its patterns and laws are often surprisingly similar.

Reference: https://guoxiangxia.blogspot.com/2020/11/the-short-board-effect-of-civilization.html

P.S. For example, for the United States

You have the courage and determination to repatriate them, but why don't you have the courage and determination to reform them? You Americans once defeated the Germans and Japanese with tens of millions of troops (they had 300 million in total during World War II), and later forced them with bayonets to establish democratic governments and abandon imperialist national policies. Now they are all your friends and helpers. The key is that most of them are now pro-American - pay special attention to this point. You now say that you can't deal with tens of millions of poor people who are unorganized, undisciplined, without money and weapons? Compared to repatriation, I think it is better to reform them. Just like you can reform the Germans and Japanese. If you give up hypocritical political correctness, it will be easy to do this. If you can't repatriate them or the cost of repatriation is too high, then reform them. They can completely become excellent labor forces in the United States. The plan is that the federal government will allocate funds to companies willing to do this project and let them complete this project (I have thought of the name: Training for the Naturalization of Foreign Immigrants in the United States of America). The federal government cannot do this project by itself, and it will only lose a lot of money. Those who disobey will be controlled by the military and police, threatened with repatriation, or actually sent back. There are almost no people willing to return to their poor and chaotic homeland.

Of course, we must make things clear, lest anyone think I have no good ideas. If Americans want to maintain the United States as a white-dominated democratic republic, illegal immigrants must be deported as much as possible. If the American people are interested in a multi-ethnic and multicultural democratic republic, some illegal immigrants can be exempted from deportation if successful transformation is achieved.

Naive people may be optimistic that if President Trump wins the election, the momentum of South Africanization of the United States will be stopped immediately. This is just a wishful thinking. President Trump has many problems to solve. Some problems may not be solved in four years. If some of these problems cannot be solved, the strategy of South Africanization of the United States will not be stopped. The South Africanization of the United States is not something that will be stopped in a few years, nor is it something that will be fully realized in a few years. Think about how long it took Rome to become an empire and then finally end. It's funny to say that the most critical factor here is the low fertility rate of people with a relatively high level of civilization. This is the so-called genitals triumphing over the brain, which shows that we humans have not yet gotten rid of animal attributes to a large extent.

Why was it a just act for the barbarians to besiege Rome and for the Jews to convert Europeans to Jesus, but it is no longer a just act for the barbarians represented by Muslims and blacks today to try to South Africanize the United States (New Rome)? The overthrow of Rome was the result of the Romans' own corruption and the siege by barbarians. Today's Westerners cannot view the conquest of Rome by Christianity simply because they believe in Christianity and most of them are descendants of the barbarians of that time. In fact, that was also a regression of civilization. Although Christianity was actually Romanized Judaism. Of course, although today's America is not perfect, it represents the highest level of human civilization. The level of civilization in Rome is obviously not comparable to that of the United States today. Even in ancient Europe, civilization went through a long dark Middle Ages after the fall of the Roman Empire. If the United States were to become South Africanized today, the era of civilizational regression would not be so long, but that would obviously not be a good thing either. Civilization made it impossible for Westerners to defeat the growing number of barbarians by physical annihilation, but the consequence of leaving it alone would be that civilization would be swallowed up by barbarism. What lessons should modern people learn from the fall of Rome? I think it is about how to civilize them quickly, and the barbarian regime must be eliminated, which is the source of the barbarians' endless sieges on Rome. If you respect their barbarism, you cannot maintain your own civilization.

Even though the barbarian states did not directly attack the United States, the cultural confidence of the barbarians who infiltrated Rome came from the strength of their mother states. However, although the Jews lost their country, they changed the Romans' minds with their beliefs. Black people in South Africa had also lost their organized power structure, but they still destroyed the rule of white South Africans. This shows that the destruction of the barbarian regime alone is not enough to prevent the South Africanization of the United States. This is a "war" that may still be going on hundreds of years after our contemporaries die.

There are only three types of wars in this world: wars between countries with the same level of civilization, but these are rare and not very cruel, and no matter which side wins, it will not lead to the decline of civilization; wars between civilized countries and barbarians, in which the conquerors of civilized countries usually treat the defeated barbarians well, and if the barbarians win, they will massacre and plunder the civilized people. The former leads to a short-term prosperity of civilization, while the latter leads to a short-term decline of civilization, but in the long run civilization will eventually conquer barbarism by conquest or infiltration; the mutual fighting between barbarians usually does not lead to the development of the level of civilization without the intervention or influence of external forces, and is very cruel - only the accumulation of culture can produce civilization, and it is difficult for war to directly cause barbarians to evolve.