Japheth’s descendants will resume their ambition to conquer the world：Exporting civilization and liberating the oppressed

 

Civilized nations have an obligation, like an elder brother guiding a younger brother, to teach barbarians that their practices are wrong and not part of so-called multiculturalism and worthy of respect. Otherwise, why would they learn to be civilized? And if they treat you civilized people in a barbaric way, how can you blame them for being ignorant or barbaric?

There are mainly two kinds of people who fiercely oppose colonialism: people who had no history before the arrival of modern European civilization, and people who fell into the autocratic system after the decline of colonialism. The former is typical of African and South American countries, and the latter is typical of Arab countries. Countries without history do not know how miserable their own countries were before the arrival of colonialism; countries that are still ruled by traditional autocratic systems need to find legitimate reasons for their current rule.

India is an exception. India has a long history and has not fallen into the shackles of autocracy after the colonialists left. Therefore, among Indians, the voice against colonialism is very weak, and there is almost no voice of hatred against the British. Indians originally lived under the oppression of the Mongol-Muslim joint autocracy. The arrival of British colonists allowed them to accept modern civilization for the first time. The quality of life of Indians has improved, the country has been unified, the level of science and technology has improved, and even the international status has improved (one of the military exploits that Indians talk about in the colonial period is the attack on Beijing under the banner of the British Empire). During the two world wars, Indians became an important supporter of the victory of the British Empire. Today, there are a large number of Indians in European and American countries, but they have not become the source of any social problems in the West so far, and have made outstanding contributions to the countries they have joined.

India still has a long way to go to become a developed country. But the case of India has successfully demonstrated that there is a possibility of a healthier globalization. The decline of Christianity, the fall of the British Empire, and the rise of postmodern decentralization theory have made Westerners lose the legitimacy, courage and excuse to promote the boundaries of civilization. However, the case of Indians shows that civilization can adopt an offensive conquering strategy if this conquest war brings freedom, equality and fraternity. In this case, Westerners act as liberators, not slave owners; Westerners’ enemies are the despotic rulers of backward nations, and the vast majority of people in backward nations will benefit from this, and they will only be grateful to Westerners, and backward countries will be reborn from the ashes. In this process, it is reasonable for Westerners to gain benefits, and the vast majority of liberated people will not be bothered by this. You must know that when we go to a restaurant to eat, we have to pay for the waiter, not to mention being liberated from the status of slaves.

Since World War II, in order to avoid another world war, an international practice of non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries has been formed. This is wrong! If your neighbors quarrel, you can pretend not to hear it; if a robber breaks into your neighbor's house and the husband cuts his wife into pieces, will you not care? The practice of watching barbaric culture and autocratic governments cruelly exploit and enslave their own people and only giving weak verbal protests should be changed. Unelected autocratic governments are robber governments that have entered the country. The people have not given them the power to rule the country; autocratic governments that cruelly exploit their own people are not only the enemies of their own people, but also the enemies of all democracies as a whole. They will use their advantages to try to infiltrate and invade democratic countries!

White people, descendants of Japheth, are destined to expand civilization. This is recorded in the Bible and told to you through the mouth of Noah. It is your historical mission to eliminate the extreme medieval religious state and liberate the enslaved and deceived people in the Middle East and the people in other regions who are under autocratic rule.

If your people indulge in pleasure and no longer fulfill this mission and no longer continue to conquer the barbarians, your country will be destroyed by the barbarians. This is a sacrificial conquest, inviting the barbarians into the civilized world by using their own disintegration. Oh, white people, don't forget: a powerful country like Rome fell in this way.

The descendants of Japheth will conquer the world, but you must do so in the name of spreading civilization and cutting off Satan's agents.

Today, about 80% of the countries in the world are still under the rule of autocracy or some degree of autocracy, and the vast majority of people in these countries are also in a position of exploitation, domination and slavery to varying degrees.

"May God enlarge Japheth, and let him dwell in the tents of Shem, and let Canaan be his servant."

Today, do the people of Western countries, led by the United States, have enough courage, wisdom and ability to unite under the banner of the savior to save the people in other underdeveloped regions?

As Chinese people, we have spent most of our history as part of empires established by our own or other ethnic groups. Consequently, a question frequently debated among us is why the thousands of miles of border between the United States and Canada are left unguarded by military forces. My answer is that the democratic systems of modern Western nations prevent them from exploiting conquered peoples as slaves, thus diminishing their interest in conquering other countries.

While the imperial system had not been entirely abolished when Jesus still held sway in the West, Westerners were enthusiastic about global expansion under the guise of spreading the gospel. However, after Nietzsche declared "God is dead" and particularly following the collapse of the British Empire, Westerners lost their interest in expanding into other regions. This marked the beginning of Western decline. Westerners are essentially pondering this question: If conquering other nations brings no benefit, why should we do it? 

If you live in a neighborhood plagued by theft, you would certainly want to move. If your neighborhood is filled with gentlemen and ladies, you would be happy to live there for a long time, without worrying about your children being harmed or your property being stolen. Moreover, when you encounter problems, you are likely to receive help. This is the benefit of transforming a community into a good one. The sons of Japheth were to conquer the world. This was God's mission for Westerners as recorded in the Bible. However, this time, instead of seeking profit, you should be aiming to liberate the descendants of Shem and Ham.

Barbarians fear strength and are not grateful for kindness. Westerners should change their attitude towards third world countries since World War II. You are not only harming yourself, but also pitting those people in third world countries. As a result, they cannot see the truth and cannot upgrade to civilization for a long time.

Although I agree with Mr. Musk that Trump is always right, there is one point in Trump's recent speech at West Point that I don't want to see. Trump said that the United States should not export democracy to other countries. My personal opinion is that the United States should export democracy to other countries, but the method should be adjusted. The most successful cases of the United States exporting democracy are Germany, Japan, South Korea, ROC, and the Philippines. These countries basically became democracies under the force or pressure of the United States. They are allies of the United States and are all very rich. The Philippines may be slightly worse. The reason why Australia, Canada, and India today broke away from the British Empire is also the result of the United States' support for national liberation movements after World War II. The establishment of an Islamic democratic country in Iraq is also looking good at the moment. In Iran, Afghanistan, and the PRC, the United States' policy of exporting democracy has failed. However, the reasons are very complicated. Oppressed nations around the world rely on American soldiers to varying degrees. The weakness of the United States lies in the instability caused by the two-party politics and the excessive indulgence of internal barbarian forces and groups that do not agree with democratic politics. But as President Trump said, persistence is very important, so the export of democracy should also be persisted.