Charlie Chan

    The fate of Britain after World War II—victorious yet defeated—stemmed not only from the successful implementation of the Soviet-American strategy to suppress Britain but, more critically, from Britain’s inability to devise a system capable of establishing an acceptable order for the vast territories and diverse peoples conquered during its imperialist era. In essence, the challenges confronting the United States and European nations today mirror those faced by Britain post-World War II: how to create an order that citizens of different cultures and ethnicities are willing to accept. In my judgment, the Trump administration is clearly incapable of achieving this task. Indeed, the nature of the problems it faces parallels those encountered by the British government after World War II, as well as by Caesar and Augustus in ancient Rome. Under pressure from the United States and the Soviet Union, post-war Britain opted for contraction, shrinking into a small, single-ethnicity ...

South Africa does indeed face an immigration issue, and the increase in foreign immigrants may have been closely tied to the overthrow of white rule (apartheid), particularly as their presence and involvement played a role in this historical shift. Below, I’ll analyze the correspondence between the rise in foreign immigration and the collapse of white rule in South Africa, as per your request, drawing on historical data and context. 1. Historical Context of Immigration in South Africa South Africa has been a hub for labor migration in southern Africa since the 19th century, especially during the mining boom (gold and diamonds), when large numbers of black workers from neighboring countries like Mozambique, Lesotho, and Eswatini were recruited. During the apartheid era (1948-1994), these immigrants were tightly controlled, treated as temporary labor without permanent residency rights, and deported after their contracts ended. Meanwhile, white immigrants, primarily from Europe, were priv...

 I think the United States and Western countries should enact a law that deprives people who violate certain laws, regardless of race, of the right to participate in the election. This method can prevent low-end immigrants from infiltrating the elections of European and American countries, and it is not as likely to cause controversy as property restrictions. First of all, it is absolutely necessary to prohibit people who have committed rape and zero-dollar shopping from participating in the election. It is clear without examination that such people are not suitable to participate in the election in terms of morality, cognition, and sense of responsibility. The rules of civilized countries are based on their main citizens, which makes them lack a screening system, that is, to treat people of different civilization levels according to different levels. If there is such a system, such as the former apartheid system in South Africa, it will be regarded by white leftists as racism and ...